<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Signs of Contradiction</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.signsofcontradiction.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.signsofcontradiction.com</link>
	<description>Faith, Politics, Life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 May 2011 14:39:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A New Badge for Girl Scouts? by Femmefatal</title>
		<link>http://www.signsofcontradiction.com/a-new-badge-for-girl-scouts/comment-page-1/#comment-216</link>
		<dc:creator>Femmefatal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2011 14:39:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.signsofcontradiction.com/?p=494#comment-216</guid>
		<description>Religion is absolutely part of girl scouts! Remember the girl scout promise? &quot;On my honor I will try to serve God and my country, to help people at all times and to live by the girl scout law.&quot; So they totally can address matters of religion and therefore morality. But personally I don&#039;t think sexual promiscuity has anything to do with morality. As a methodist, my pastor never once stood in front of the congregation and talked about the evils of pre-marital sex or that promiscuity would compromise my relationship with my Lord. That&#039;s something I heard for the first time from Brother Micah on the Commons. 

I would love the girl scouts (the seniors not the brownies of course) to learn about sexual health! I think information will  allow our daughters to make informed decisions about their sex lives. Because when we talk about it and they know all about it, don&#039;t you think they&#039;ll be less likely to be pressured into something they didn&#039;t really want?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Religion is absolutely part of girl scouts! Remember the girl scout promise? &#8220;On my honor I will try to serve God and my country, to help people at all times and to live by the girl scout law.&#8221; So they totally can address matters of religion and therefore morality. But personally I don&#8217;t think sexual promiscuity has anything to do with morality. As a methodist, my pastor never once stood in front of the congregation and talked about the evils of pre-marital sex or that promiscuity would compromise my relationship with my Lord. That&#8217;s something I heard for the first time from Brother Micah on the Commons. </p>
<p>I would love the girl scouts (the seniors not the brownies of course) to learn about sexual health! I think information will  allow our daughters to make informed decisions about their sex lives. Because when we talk about it and they know all about it, don&#8217;t you think they&#8217;ll be less likely to be pressured into something they didn&#8217;t really want?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Normalization of &#8220;Gay&#8221; by Shelby</title>
		<link>http://www.signsofcontradiction.com/the-normalization-of-gay/comment-page-1/#comment-215</link>
		<dc:creator>Shelby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2011 04:19:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.signsofcontradiction.com/?p=419#comment-215</guid>
		<description>Hello, I&#039;m not sure where to begin on this article. While I completely agree with your right to express your opinion on homosexuality, I also think that if you are going to do it, it should be educated and supported by fact. 

To begin, there is a difference between sex and gender as well as a difference between a &quot;lesbian&quot; student and a &quot;transgender&quot; student. You don&#039;t find gender in between your legs, only genitals that define your sex [male or female being most common.] But there are also many other people who are born with a mixture of sex characteristics. Gender is the way you express that sex. You and I may do it by wearing a pretty dress or makeup which is the norm in our society. Our vagina + our inclination to express ourselves in a &quot;feminine&quot; manner = woman according to society. However not everyone feels comfortable in the skin the were born into and there is more and more medical evidence that biological processes are responsible for a mix up in hormones or even an extra y or x chromosome. Someone who has a vagina but does not identify with it because their head tells them it does not fit may not feel comfortable using the bathroom with other women. No one makes you feel uncomfortable in a public restroom and everyone should have the right to feel safe. Gender neutral bathrooms are single stalled nearly everywhere and no one is forced to use it. Why is it such a bad thing to make everyone feel comfortable? Or is the majority opinion the only one that matters?

Secondly, disproportionately, heterosexism is promoted and normalized in our society. Much like being white or non-disabled, or middle-class. These are the groups we see most often on television and though gay people have been represented more in the media, the majority of kids will grow up believing that girls marry boys and boys marry girls. In your opinion, heteronormativity is a good thing. But what is inherently good about it? Everything &quot;positive&quot; that results from it is subjective; ie: procreation. Your belief that the bible says heterosexuality is inherently good is only your opinion and that does not mean it is the only one that should be expressed. There are gay families as well as racial minority families, homeless families, and families with disabled parents. All of these families are underrepresented in the media in comparison to the norm. Representing them occasionally will at the most validate someone who has same sex parents rather than making the feel invisible or make people less likely to discriminate. Your belief that people should not act upon their feelings does not eliminate the existence of married couples who do nothing more than share a love between themselves. Everyone deserves equal treatment and representation. Last time I checked, the bible doesn&#039;t determine who gets what. 

Oh and finally, before you speak about homosexuality as a &quot;curable&quot; disorder, why don&#039;t you look at the treatment that was associated with the condition previous to 1970- Treatments such as forced sex with prostitutes while under forced ifluence of drugs and alcohol,forced electric shock therapy (manty times attatched to genitals) often causing convulsions and intense pain, forced genital mutilation such as Castrations, cliterodectomies, lobotomies and genital cauterizations. Note a lobotomy is when someone inserts an icepick like structure through your eye socket to destroy nerve connections that either alter your personality which could make you unable to function in society, turn you into a vegetable, or kill you. Treatments like this were being performed on gay patients in mental institutions where they are forced to go! When you define something as a mental illness, anyone that we decide has it can be forcibly held and treated in a mental institution! Could we not define abstinence as a mental disorder if we really wanted? I&#039;m sure I could come up with some intelligent reasoning that says you are messed up because you are not responding to your normal instinct to procreate. I know that is an exaggeration but imagine receiving treatment such as this or being labeled as mentally defective simply because of who you love. 

I hope I have given you something to think about. We are all people. We do not demand your acceptance, you have the right to your opinion and you can teach your kids or preach to the public whatever you please, but so does everyone else. Heteronormativity causes more harm than an episode of GLEE ever could. Get your facts straight.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello, I&#8217;m not sure where to begin on this article. While I completely agree with your right to express your opinion on homosexuality, I also think that if you are going to do it, it should be educated and supported by fact. </p>
<p>To begin, there is a difference between sex and gender as well as a difference between a &#8220;lesbian&#8221; student and a &#8220;transgender&#8221; student. You don&#8217;t find gender in between your legs, only genitals that define your sex [male or female being most common.] But there are also many other people who are born with a mixture of sex characteristics. Gender is the way you express that sex. You and I may do it by wearing a pretty dress or makeup which is the norm in our society. Our vagina + our inclination to express ourselves in a &#8220;feminine&#8221; manner = woman according to society. However not everyone feels comfortable in the skin the were born into and there is more and more medical evidence that biological processes are responsible for a mix up in hormones or even an extra y or x chromosome. Someone who has a vagina but does not identify with it because their head tells them it does not fit may not feel comfortable using the bathroom with other women. No one makes you feel uncomfortable in a public restroom and everyone should have the right to feel safe. Gender neutral bathrooms are single stalled nearly everywhere and no one is forced to use it. Why is it such a bad thing to make everyone feel comfortable? Or is the majority opinion the only one that matters?</p>
<p>Secondly, disproportionately, heterosexism is promoted and normalized in our society. Much like being white or non-disabled, or middle-class. These are the groups we see most often on television and though gay people have been represented more in the media, the majority of kids will grow up believing that girls marry boys and boys marry girls. In your opinion, heteronormativity is a good thing. But what is inherently good about it? Everything &#8220;positive&#8221; that results from it is subjective; ie: procreation. Your belief that the bible says heterosexuality is inherently good is only your opinion and that does not mean it is the only one that should be expressed. There are gay families as well as racial minority families, homeless families, and families with disabled parents. All of these families are underrepresented in the media in comparison to the norm. Representing them occasionally will at the most validate someone who has same sex parents rather than making the feel invisible or make people less likely to discriminate. Your belief that people should not act upon their feelings does not eliminate the existence of married couples who do nothing more than share a love between themselves. Everyone deserves equal treatment and representation. Last time I checked, the bible doesn&#8217;t determine who gets what. </p>
<p>Oh and finally, before you speak about homosexuality as a &#8220;curable&#8221; disorder, why don&#8217;t you look at the treatment that was associated with the condition previous to 1970- Treatments such as forced sex with prostitutes while under forced ifluence of drugs and alcohol,forced electric shock therapy (manty times attatched to genitals) often causing convulsions and intense pain, forced genital mutilation such as Castrations, cliterodectomies, lobotomies and genital cauterizations. Note a lobotomy is when someone inserts an icepick like structure through your eye socket to destroy nerve connections that either alter your personality which could make you unable to function in society, turn you into a vegetable, or kill you. Treatments like this were being performed on gay patients in mental institutions where they are forced to go! When you define something as a mental illness, anyone that we decide has it can be forcibly held and treated in a mental institution! Could we not define abstinence as a mental disorder if we really wanted? I&#8217;m sure I could come up with some intelligent reasoning that says you are messed up because you are not responding to your normal instinct to procreate. I know that is an exaggeration but imagine receiving treatment such as this or being labeled as mentally defective simply because of who you love. </p>
<p>I hope I have given you something to think about. We are all people. We do not demand your acceptance, you have the right to your opinion and you can teach your kids or preach to the public whatever you please, but so does everyone else. Heteronormativity causes more harm than an episode of GLEE ever could. Get your facts straight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The ADL&#8217;s anti-Conservative Propaganda by Kathy Allen</title>
		<link>http://www.signsofcontradiction.com/the-adls-anti-conservative-propaganda/comment-page-1/#comment-206</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathy Allen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jan 2011 21:03:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.signsofcontradiction.com/?p=129#comment-206</guid>
		<description>Great advice given in regards to my overall health.-Free Medication Help</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great advice given in regards to my overall health.-Free Medication Help</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Anne Coulter: &#8220;Victim of Hate Crime&#8221; by ian</title>
		<link>http://www.signsofcontradiction.com/anne-coulter-victim-of-hate-crime/comment-page-1/#comment-185</link>
		<dc:creator>ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 03:10:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.signsofcontradiction.com/?p=537#comment-185</guid>
		<description>Yeah she is!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah she is!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Anne Coulter: &#8220;Victim of Hate Crime&#8221; by Andrew Patchan</title>
		<link>http://www.signsofcontradiction.com/anne-coulter-victim-of-hate-crime/comment-page-1/#comment-176</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Patchan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 00:03:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.signsofcontradiction.com/?p=537#comment-176</guid>
		<description>Coulter is awesome!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Coulter is awesome!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Health Care Discussion by Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.signsofcontradiction.com/health-care-discussion/comment-page-1/#comment-175</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 23:59:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.signsofcontradiction.com/?p=528#comment-175</guid>
		<description>I care about others. I just don&#039;t believe in stealing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I care about others. I just don&#8217;t believe in stealing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Health Care Discussion by Joe</title>
		<link>http://www.signsofcontradiction.com/health-care-discussion/comment-page-1/#comment-172</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 00:53:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.signsofcontradiction.com/?p=528#comment-172</guid>
		<description>You can&#039;t just flat out say this bill will fund abortions.  Just because it&#039;s a possibility doesn&#039;t mean it&#039;s a fact.  Agreed that with midterm elections coming up this bill has a tough road ahead of it, but hopefully it&#039;ll be more of a amending process rather than many republicans apparently caring for no one but themselves (sup Andrew?).  Granted each individual shouldn&#039;t probably be hit as hard as they are to help fund this, but the idea of helping 30 million plus individuals is fantastic to me.  I personally don&#039;t mind working to help others, because if I was in the situation of the millions of uninsured Americans, I&#039;d greatly appreciate the aid.

Also, Andrew, you state it like getting health care is incredibly easy when I do hope you&#039;ve been awake for the entire economic crisis and plummeting job market.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can&#8217;t just flat out say this bill will fund abortions.  Just because it&#8217;s a possibility doesn&#8217;t mean it&#8217;s a fact.  Agreed that with midterm elections coming up this bill has a tough road ahead of it, but hopefully it&#8217;ll be more of a amending process rather than many republicans apparently caring for no one but themselves (sup Andrew?).  Granted each individual shouldn&#8217;t probably be hit as hard as they are to help fund this, but the idea of helping 30 million plus individuals is fantastic to me.  I personally don&#8217;t mind working to help others, because if I was in the situation of the millions of uninsured Americans, I&#8217;d greatly appreciate the aid.</p>
<p>Also, Andrew, you state it like getting health care is incredibly easy when I do hope you&#8217;ve been awake for the entire economic crisis and plummeting job market.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Health Care Discussion by Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.signsofcontradiction.com/health-care-discussion/comment-page-1/#comment-170</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 18:21:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.signsofcontradiction.com/?p=528#comment-170</guid>
		<description>If you want health care, get a job. No one is entitled to the fruits of my labor except for me. I don&#039;t expect other people to pay for anything I consume (including healthcare), and I damn sure don&#039;t expect to pay for things other people consume. As far as funding abortion goes, maybe it&#039;s a good thing -- one less ignorant wellfare queen that those of us who work for a living will have to support.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you want health care, get a job. No one is entitled to the fruits of my labor except for me. I don&#8217;t expect other people to pay for anything I consume (including healthcare), and I damn sure don&#8217;t expect to pay for things other people consume. As far as funding abortion goes, maybe it&#8217;s a good thing &#8212; one less ignorant wellfare queen that those of us who work for a living will have to support.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Health Care Discussion by Ian Anderson</title>
		<link>http://www.signsofcontradiction.com/health-care-discussion/comment-page-1/#comment-169</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Anderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 18:09:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.signsofcontradiction.com/?p=528#comment-169</guid>
		<description>I think it&#039;s a horrible idea, both for the country and for the Democratic Party.  I don&#039;t know why they did this now - midterm elections are now approaching with a Republican party who now (at least in the House) unanimously opposes it.  It&#039;s an incredibly dumb move, but will be very interesting to see the outcome.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s a horrible idea, both for the country and for the Democratic Party.  I don&#8217;t know why they did this now &#8211; midterm elections are now approaching with a Republican party who now (at least in the House) unanimously opposes it.  It&#8217;s an incredibly dumb move, but will be very interesting to see the outcome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Tea Partiers or Tea Crashers? by Andrew Patchan</title>
		<link>http://www.signsofcontradiction.com/tea-partiers-or-tea-crashers/comment-page-1/#comment-131</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Patchan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 22:50:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.signsofcontradiction.com/?p=490#comment-131</guid>
		<description>Ashton, I believe the situation is actually the reverse of what you have stated, and that the Republicans have crashed the Tea Party.  Party hacks like Palin, Beck, and Hannity have no place in the Tea Party, and have destroyed the Tea Party movement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ashton, I believe the situation is actually the reverse of what you have stated, and that the Republicans have crashed the Tea Party.  Party hacks like Palin, Beck, and Hannity have no place in the Tea Party, and have destroyed the Tea Party movement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

